Skip to main content

API cost comparison

OpenAI vs Anthropic API Cost Comparison

Provider-level pricing is not one number. This page uses GPT-4.1 mini and Claude Haiku 4.5 as disclosed lower-cost representatives available in the TokenMath catalog.

Standard workload comparison

1,000 input tokens + 300 output tokens × 10,000 requests per month, with no cache or batch discount.

Monthly cost difference: $16.20

Compared model rates and standard workload costs
Provider / modelInput / 1MOutput / 1MCached input / 1MMonthly exampleVerification

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 mini

$0.40$1.60$0.10$8.80Lowest costVerified

Jun 21, 2026

OpenAI model pricing

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

$1.00$5.00$0.10$25.00Verified

Jun 21, 2026

Anthropic Claude API pricing

When each option may fit

These are decision prompts, not quality rankings. Validate capability, latency, context limits, rate limits, and reliability with your own evaluation set.

When the OpenAI option may fit

  • Your stack already depends on OpenAI tooling or model behavior.
  • The representative model passes your quality evaluation.
  • Its rate and operational constraints fit your volume.

When the Anthropic option may fit

  • Claude-specific behavior performs well for your task.
  • You value the provider's model and tooling ecosystem.
  • You have compared rate limits, latency, and reliability separately.

Frequently asked questions

Does this compare every OpenAI and Anthropic model?

No. It compares the two representative models named on the page. Use the model pricing comparison for the wider catalog.

Is either provider universally cheaper?

No. Provider cost depends on the selected model, token mix, caching, batch mode, and workload.