Skip to main content

API cost comparison

Gemini vs Claude API Cost Comparison

This provider comparison uses Gemini 2.5 Flash and Claude Haiku 4.5. Their capabilities are not assumed to be equivalent; only the disclosed workload cost is compared.

Standard workload comparison

1,000 input tokens + 300 output tokens × 10,000 requests per month, with no cache or batch discount.

Monthly cost difference: $14.50

Compared model rates and standard workload costs
Provider / modelInput / 1MOutput / 1MCached input / 1MMonthly exampleVerification

Google Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

$0.30$2.50$0.03$10.50Lowest costVerified

Jun 21, 2026

Google Gemini API pricing

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

$1.00$5.00$0.10$25.00Verified

Jun 21, 2026

Anthropic Claude API pricing

When each option may fit

These are decision prompts, not quality rankings. Validate capability, latency, context limits, rate limits, and reliability with your own evaluation set.

When the Gemini option may fit

  • The workload prioritizes low unit cost and throughput.
  • Gemini's feature set matches your integration.
  • Your evaluation confirms acceptable output quality.

When the Claude option may fit

  • Claude behavior is a better fit for the target task.
  • Provider tooling and policies align with your deployment.
  • Measured success rate justifies the model choice.

Frequently asked questions

Does the cheaper example model always reduce product cost?

No. Retries, response length, human review, and failure rates can outweigh a lower token rate.

Can I compare Sonnet or Gemini Pro instead?

Yes. Open the model pricing comparison or token cost calculator and apply the same workload to those models.